Trying to choose between DMARCReport, EasyDMARC, or other MTA-STS hosting options for your clients? If you’re an MSP managing email authentication, secure transport, and DNS-based security policies across dozens—or even hundreds—of customer domains, the right platform can make or break your efficiency, compliance readiness, and security outcomes.

This in-depth comparison of DMARCReport vs EasyDMARC vs generic MTA-STS hosting breaks down features, reporting capabilities, integrations, pricing, scalability, and the overall MSP experience. By the end, you’ll know exactly which solution fits your technical needs, client contracts, and operational workflows.

Why This Matters: Email Authentication Is Now Mandatory for MSPs

With Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, and most major mailbox providers tightening authentication requirements, DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS, and TLS-RPT are no longer “nice to have.” They’re required for:

Preventing domain spoofing
Meeting CIS, SOC 2, ISO 27001, and NIST frameworks
Protecting client brands
Ensuring email deliverability
Avoiding compliance penalties
Securing outbound transport (mandatory TLS)

MSPs are now expected to implement and maintain these standards across all client domains—with minimal margin for error.

That’s why choosing the right DMARC/MTA-STS solution is now a strategic decision, not a tactical one.

DMARCReport vs EasyDMARC vs Self-Hosted: Feature Breakdown

Below is a detailed comparison of how DMARCReport, EasyDMARC, and DIY MTA-STS hosting stack up across mission-critical categories.

DMARCReport: MSP-Optimized Reporting + Automated MTA-STS Hosting

DMARCReport is purpose-built for managed service providers. Its core design philosophy is to eliminate unnecessary DNS, server, and configuration work—and replace it with automation, clarity, and scale.

Advanced DMARC Aggregate & Forensic Reporting

DMARCReport provides:

Granular RUA reports with sending source mapping
Human-friendly breakdowns of SPF and DKIM alignment
Automatic grouping of third-party SaaS senders
Attack classification (spoofing, misconfiguration, forwarding)
Rich RUF forensic visibility for security teams

Reports are designed to give MSPs immediate insight into where authentication is failing so issues can be escalated or remediated quickly.

Fully Managed MTA-STS Hosting (Set It and Forget It)

Most MTA-STS implementations require:

Hosting the policy file
Managing HTTPS
Maintaining TLS certificates
Updating policy versions
Ensuring correct MIME types
Handling redirects or CDN behavior

DMARCReport automates all of this, including:

Hosted MTA-STS policy files
Automatic SSL/TLS certificate management
Instant policy versioning
Support for both testing and enforcing modes
No server or CDN provisioning required

For MSPs managing multiple client domains, this eliminates dozens of hours of manual work per year.

TLS-RPT Reporting Dashboard

DMARCReport parses TLS-RPT XML files submitted by:

Gmail
Outlook
Yahoo
Fastmail
Apple Mail servers

The dashboard highlights:

Failed TLS connections
Downgrade attacks
Certificate mismatches
Policy errors
Intermittent delivery failures

This type of reporting is extremely difficult to analyze manually.

MSP-Ready Features

DMARCReport includes:

Multi-domain dashboard
Whitelabel UI for client reporting
Scheduled automated client summaries
API-first design for PSA, SOC, and SIEM integrations
Role-based access control
Priority support for MSP tier

These features directly support managed service workflows.

EasyDMARC: A Strong Email Security Suite for SMBs and IT Teams

EasyDMARC is a well-known and feature-rich platform that appeals largely to internal IT teams and SMBs. While powerful, its MSP-scaling capabilities are not as comprehensive.

DMARC Tools with Broader Email Security Features

EasyDMARC includes:

Alignment results
Vendor mapping
SPF and DKIM validators
Various security add-ons
Domain scanning capabilities

It is strong at giving non-technical users a high-level view of domain health.

MTA-STS Hosting (More Manual Steps Required)

EasyDMARC does offer MTA-STS hosting, but MSPs must typically handle:

DNS templates
Manual policy setup
TLS-RPT handling

Compared to DMARCReport’s turnkey automation, EasyDMARC requires a bit more effort to deploy and maintain.

Integrations and Workflow Support

EasyDMARC integrates with productivity suites and email platforms, though MSP-specific features (whitelabeling, multi-client management, PSA integrations) are not as robust.

Ideal for SMB IT teams—less optimized for MSP multi-domain scale.

Generic MTA-STS Hosting (Cloudflare, S3, Self-Hosted): Flexible but Heavy-Lift

Many MSPs start with DIY hosting options because they seem straightforward—but they quickly become operational burdens.

What You Must Maintain Manually

DIY hosting requires:

Creating an S3 bucket or Worker script
Purchasing or managing SSL/TLS certs
Handling renewal failures
Monitoring certificate expiry
Fixing MIME type issues
Creating CI/CD pipelines for versioning
Updating policy files manually
Parsing TLS-RPT reports from XML

This is time-consuming and error-prone—especially across multiple client domains.

No Centralized Dashboard

Unlike DMARCReport or EasyDMARC, DIY hosting provides:

No visualization
No alerts
No automated reporting
No forensic grouping
No integrations

MSPs must build everything themselves.

Pricing Comparison: Which Is Most Cost-Effective for MSPs?

DMARCReport — Best Value for MSP Scale

DMARCReport offers:

Free Tier: DMARC monitoring + basic DNS validation
Pro Tier: Full reporting, automated MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, alerts
MSP Tier: Whitelabeling, multi-domain management, unlimited clients

All tiers include unlimited report retention—ideal for compliance-driven clients (legal, healthcare, finance, government).

EasyDMARC — Flexible, but Higher Cost for Add-Ons

EasyDMARC offers:

Free monitoring tier
Add-on pricing for BIMI, MTA-STS, SPF flattening, and advanced reporting

Costs can grow quickly for MSPs managing many domains.

DIY Hosting — Cheap, but Labor Intensive

DIY is inexpensive at first but costly long-term:

Engineering hours
Monitoring
Troubleshooting
SSL certificate management
Manual TLS-RPT parsing
No centralized MSP management

Total cost of ownership is significantly higher than it appears.

User Experience Comparison

DMARCReport: Clean, Organized, Efficient

Intuitive dashboards with minimal clutter
Fast onboarding thanks to automated DNS validation
Designed for multi-domain, multi-client environments
Easy enough for non-technical clients to understand

Perfect for MSPs that value clarity and repeatable workflows.

EasyDMARC: Visual and Broad

Bright, visual dashboards
Helpful for SMBs or single-domain setups
May require more manual organization for MSP workflows

DIY Hosting: Developer-Only

No dashboards
CLI-/server-oriented
Not practical for helpdesk or client-facing support teams

Integration Comparison

DMARCReport Integrations

SIEM ingestion
PSA/workflow automation
Webhooks
Scheduled reports sent directly to clients
JSON/CSV exports

Highly optimized for managed services.

EasyDMARC Integrations

Compatible with productivity suites
Good general-purpose integrations
Fewer MSP-focused workflows

DIY Integrations

Must build everything manually
No built-in reporting
Requires engineering bandwidth

Why DMARCReport, EasyDMARC, and MTA-STS Hosting Matter for MSPs

MSPs are now expected to:

✔ Deploy DMARC at enforcement

✔ Enforce MTA-STS across client domains

✔ Monitor TLS failures

✔ Manage SPF, DKIM, and alignment

✔ Detect spoofing attempts

✔ Maintain compliance documentation

The right platform dramatically reduces:

Engineering time
Ticket volume
False positives
Client confusion
Delivery failures
Compliance risks

Alternative Tools MSPs Also Consider

Although DMARCReport is the best fit for multi-domain managed service environments, MSPs often evaluate additional platforms depending on client requirements:

Valimail

Strong enterprise automation; more expensive.

dmarcian

Great training and documentation; less MSP-focused.

OnDMARC

Strong BIMI capabilities; higher cost.

Cloudflare MTA-STS

DNS only; requires external hosting and heavy manual setup.

Final Verdict: DMARCReport vs EasyDMARC — Which Is Best for MSPs in 2025?

After analyzing the platforms, here’s the clear breakdown:

⭐ Choose DMARCReport if you are an MSP needing:

Turnkey MTA-STS hosting with automatic SSL and policy management
Automated DMARC reporting across many client domains
MSP-first workflows (multi-domain view, whitelabeling, API automation)
Simple client onboarding
Low ongoing maintenance

DMARCReport is built specifically for multi-client environments and saves MSPs dozens of hours per month.

⭐ Choose EasyDMARC if you are an internal IT team or SMB needing:

A broad email security suite
Visual dashboards
Standalone alignment tools
Simple domain monitoring

Ideal for single-domain or low-complexity environments.

⭐ Choose DIY MTA-STS Hosting only if:

You have a dedicated engineering team
You want to control every detail manually
You accept the maintenance overhead
You’re managing only one or two domains

Not recommended for MSPs due to operational burden.

For MSPs in 2025, DMARCReport delivers the best combination of automation, scalability, pricing, and security visibility—making it the top choice for managing DMARC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and domain authentication across all clients.