As email-based attacks surge and threat actors continue to exploit domain spoofing, MSPs are under increasing pressure to deploy and manage DMARC reporting for their clients. But with so many DMARC platforms available, choosing the right tool can be challenging—especially when balancing visibility, scalability, ease of use, and profitability.

Two solutions consistently appear on MSP shortlists: DMARCReport and PowerDMARC. Both platforms help organizations interpret DMARC XML reports, track domain authentication health, identify spoofing attempts, and troubleshoot SPF/DKIM alignment issues. However, they differ significantly in approach, complexity, pricing structure, and—most importantly—their suitability for MSP environments.

This in-depth comparison breaks down everything MSPs need to know: features, pricing, integrations, UI differences, MSP workflows, client-facing experience, and how each platform performs in real-world MSP service delivery.

Whether you support 10 domains or 1,000, this expanded guide will help you make the right choice for your clients and your business.

Why MSPs Need the Right DMARC Reporting Platform

Before diving into comparisons, it’s important to acknowledge the new norm in MSP service delivery: email authentication is no longer optional, and SMB clients increasingly depend on MSPs to handle every aspect of domain security.

With Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and other mailbox providers tightening DMARC requirements, MSPs must:

• Implement DMARC for every client
• Continuously parse and monitor DMARC aggregate reports
• Detect unauthorized senders
• Troubleshoot SPF and DKIM issues
• Guide clients to DMARC enforcement
• Prove ongoing value with clear reports
• Reduce administrative overhead through automation

The right DMARC platform:

• Saves technicians hours every month
• Improves deliverability and reduces client complaints
• Strengthens your cybersecurity stack
• Helps MSPs achieve compliance with CIS / NIST / Cyber Essentials / SOC2 controls
• Makes DMARC a profitable recurring service

DMARCReport and PowerDMARC each provide different paths to achieving this.

DMARCReport vs PowerDMARC: High-Level Summary

Feature Category	DMARCReport	PowerDMARC
MSP Focus	✔ Built specifically for MSPs	✖ Primarily enterprise-focused
Multi-Tenant Management	✔ Fully optimized	✔ Available but less intuitive
Complexity	Low (ideal for SMB MSPs)	Medium/High (suited for enterprise)
Pricing	Transparent, MSP-friendly	Varies, often higher for full suite
Reporting	Clean, simple, actionable	Highly detailed, more technical
Add-On Modules	Minimal	Extensive suite of authentication tools
Ideal For	MSPs handling SMB/mid-market clients	MSPs with enterprise-heavy clientele

Deep Feature Comparison: DMARCReport vs PowerDMARC

1. DMARC Analytics & Visibility

DMARCReport

DMARCReport excels at presenting complex authentication data in a clear, digestible format suitable for both MSP technicians and non-technical clients.

Dashboards include:

• Domain alignment summaries
• Pass/fail authentication rates
• Source-of-failure breakdowns
• Service provider identification
• Spoofing and fraud attempts
• Historical trends

The platform focuses heavily on clarity and interpretability—reducing noise and helping MSPs quickly pinpoint misalignments.

PowerDMARC

PowerDMARC provides detailed DMARC analytics with more technical granularity, including:

• Global threat intelligence overlays
• Rogue IP attribution
• Deep forensic-level options
• Multi-layer authentication dashboards

While powerful, the interface can feel more enterprise-oriented, and less accessible to smaller MSPs or client users.

2. Multi-Tenant MSP Management

DMARCReport (Category Leader)

Designed from the ground up for MSP service delivery:

• True multi-tenant design
• Easy domain onboarding
• Role-based access
• Centralized dashboard for all clients
• Optional white-label and branded reporting
• Simple domain expansion workflows

Large MSPs or those scaling DMARC services benefit significantly from this structure.

PowerDMARC

PowerDMARC supports multi-domain and multi-customer structures, but:

• Management is less streamlined
• Multi-tenant flows require more configuration
• Designed primarily for enterprise security teams, not MSP workflows

MSPs often need to create custom workarounds for efficient navigation.

3. SPF/DKIM Troubleshooting & Alignment Features

DMARCReport

DMARCReport includes integrated tools such as:

• SPF record lookup
• SPF flattening support
• DKIM checker
• Alignment error insights

These tools are built around real-world MSP troubleshooting scenarios, especially for clients using multiple third-party senders (e.g., Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Mailchimp, CRM tools).

PowerDMARC

PowerDMARC offers:

• SPF flattening
• Secure SPF (SPF limit protection)
• DKIM analyzers
• DNS monitoring
• Email authentication suite add-ons (BIMI, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT)

These capabilities are powerful, but may be more than some MSPs need.

4. Alerts & Notifications

DMARCReport

• Customizable alerts
• Simple, MSP-ready notifications
• Easy escalation through email/webhooks

Clean, minimal, and non-intrusive.

PowerDMARC

• Multi-level alerts
• More granular threshold settings
• Notifications tied to a wider suite of tools

Best suited for MSPs with a dedicated security operations team.

5. Integrations & API

DMARCReport Integrations

• PSA/RMM-friendly workflows
• Webhooks for automation
• SIEM export pipelines
• Straightforward API for bulk provisioning

Ideal for MSPs that want plug-and-play compatibility without complexity.

PowerDMARC Integrations

• SIEM integrations
• Extended API toolkit
• Additional modules for MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, BIMI

More comprehensive, but also more configuration-intensive.

Pricing: MSP Profitability & Scalability

DMARCReport (Best for MSP Resale)

DMARCReport is intentionally designed to support MSP pricing structures:

• Predictable per-domain/per-client pricing
• Accessible entry tiers
• No expensive module-based licensing
• No hidden restrictions
• Scales smoothly as MSP adds clients
• Very strong margins for resold DMARC services

Many MSPs bundle DMARCReport into an email security or compliance package.

PowerDMARC

PowerDMARC’s pricing tends to be:

• Higher for full feature access
• Modular (cost depends on which authentication features are used)
• More enterprise-oriented
• Less predictable for small/Mid-MSP client bases

PowerDMARC is typically a better fit for MSPs managing highly regulated or enterprise-scale clients.

User Experience: Technician & Client-Facing

DMARCReport: Clean, Simple, Client-Friendly

DMARCReport is consistently praised for:

• Fast learning curve
• Simple client-facing visuals
• Easy onboarding
• Minimal configuration
• Flat, modern, intuitive layout

Technicians spend less time training and more time acting on insights.

Clients find DMARCReport reports easy to understand, reducing friction in QBRs or compliance meetings.

PowerDMARC: More Detailed But More Complex

PowerDMARC’s UI:

• Feels more enterprise grade
• Has more menu depth
• Requires more training to fully leverage
• Can overwhelm SMB clients

Power users and security teams appreciate the power; SMB clients may struggle.

MSP Operational Fit

DMARCReport is ideal if your MSP needs:

• A DMARC tool built specifically for MSP workflows
• Quick onboarding with minimal friction
• Clean reporting SMB clients can understand
• Predictable licensing and strong profit margin potential
• A low-overhead platform your team doesn’t have to “babysit”
• Rapid troubleshooting for multi-sender SMB environments

PowerDMARC is ideal if your MSP supports:

Extended Alternatives in the DMARC Reporting Ecosystem

While DMARCReport and PowerDMARC are top options, MSPs may also evaluate these platforms:

Valimail

Best for: Large enterprises or MSPs supporting regulated industries.
Strengths:

• Rigorous DMARC enforcement tools
• Strong enterprise reputation
• Automated configuration options

Weaknesses:

• Pricing can be cost-prohibitive
• Heavy learning curve

dmarcian

Best for: MSPs that value education-heavy tooling.
Strengths:

• Great onboarding resources
• Good visual reporting
• Long-standing DMARC pioneer

Weaknesses:

• Less MSP-focused
• UI less modern compared to newer platforms

Agari (Fortra)

Best for: SOC teams needing threat-level intelligence.
Strengths:

• Deep visibility into attack sources
• High-level threat attribution
• Enterprise-grade analytics

Weaknesses:

• High cost
• Overkill for SMB MSP clients

OnDMARC

Best for: Smaller MSPs wanting guided configuration.
Strengths:

• Step-by-step wizards for SPF/DKIM/DMARC
• Easy to onboard small clients
• Clean interface

Weaknesses:

• Less multi-tenant maturity than dedicated MSP platforms
  

Final Verdict: DMARCReport vs PowerDMARC for MSPs

Choosing between DMARCReport and PowerDMARC depends on your MSP’s client base, team structure, and long-term service strategy.

Choose DMARCReport if:

You want a tool specifically designed for MSP workflows—simple, clean, scalable, and highly profitable. It’s ideal if your clients are mostly SMB or mid-market organizations.

DMARCReport brings:

• MSP-native multi-tenant design
• Predictable pricing
• Lightning-fast onboarding
• Clear, client-friendly dashboards
• Automated insights and low overhead
• Easy integrations for MSP tools
• Strong margins for resold DMARC services

For the majority of MSPs, this is the most operationally efficient and cost-effective choice.

Choose PowerDMARC if:

Your MSP supports enterprise clients or needs a fully loaded email authentication suite with in-depth modules like:

• BIMI
• TLS-RPT
• MTA-STS
• Forensic-level analysis

PowerDMARC shines in complex, compliance-driven environments with large IT or security teams.

Bottom Line

For most MSPs working with SMB and mid-market clients, DMARCReport is the superior platform—thanks to its MSP-first design, simple reporting, predictable cost model, and operational efficiency.

PowerDMARC remains a strong contender if your MSP requires enterprise-grade authentication tools beyond DMARC reporting.